SDP MULTIMEDIA GROUP

Frequently Asked Questions:

"False Personation of a Felony"

When a person commits a felony, and then seeks to portray that the justification for the initial felony was some other invented felony or construed felony - a result of the actual act of a felony against the first party, as a legal DEFENSE, such as GENOCIDE. This defense strategy is the aggravated form of "Misprision of a Felony", making false report to knowingly conceal another felony committed by the reporting party, as is common in the war crime genocide and justification of genocide (a crime).

In modern terms, we would call this "DEEP FAKE" blackmail and extortion, which when used in family separation for perpetual loss of contact between a child and parent is genocide on face; and proof of premeditation (plan) to commit genocide - a separate charge and war crime count, made in addition to the act and the failure to act to restore rights (2 more counts).

With this in mind, Petersen v ALLEN remains a classic "Hegelian Dialectic War Crime" of the 21st Century, and grounds to assert forfeiture of the registry governed by the BERNE CONVENTION held by NATION OF JAPAN, Kingdom of Sweden, and UNITED STATES; for their role in such fraud and taking a scheme or plan to commit forfeiture of estate and sale of property to 5% shareholder themed a "patent" development firm in SHENZEN, China, known to us now as "TENCENT".

Acts in context to the industry role of JAMES ALLEN as a "SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER" for NORTEL NETWORKS in 2000-2001, for benefit to NTT AMERICA, NTT GROUP, HETZNER.DE, and TENCENT group (PRC), as a commercial fraud sustained from 2001-2020 in industrial espionage activity themed a clear violation of the Sherman Anti Trust Act per 230 documents tendered by the "187 Group" in State of Texas, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan, State of New York, State of California, and nationals involved in the IETF / ICANN organizations benefitting from this racketeering activity themed to be dual South Korean / United States citizens enjoined in the LOSTSERVER.NET group joining PCH / NTT / INFOMART / EQUINIX parties in the actions of 2001-2020 concealment; threats; and industry fraud to extort Oklahoma based employees of NORTEL NETWORKS, working a $2 billion fraud in industry market share and $468 billion Title IV fraud against the Treasury of the United States, evident in documents of PETERSEN v ALLEN and contrary 45 CFR rule, Tuner v Rogers et al (2011) admission of "coercion" a criminal racket on record of the States, and admission of fraud in Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244 prohibiting this action affirmed 9-0 by SCOTUS in 2019 ruling 586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091.

The use of a public stigma to intimidate the public and other States and officers against acting to investigate, as obligated a rule of 22 U.S.C. Chapter 78, human trafficking, and to dismiss human trafficking by the State governments or their officers and Courts, contrary EXCESSIVE FINES and BLACK CODES in the law cited by Justice Ginsburg in case 17-1091 opinion.

Whereby such acts violate 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(9) and 666(a)(10) rule; on evidence and face of record, to kidnap UNITED STATES CITIZENS in influence of patent and credit not permitted by Federal Law, confessed in evidence TEXAS FAMILY CODE section 157.008 express felony violation of 18 USC 241 and 242 rule; not permitted a statute of any State or UNITED STATES.

And such acts to impair the ordinary 76 O.S. 76-1, 76-3, 76-4, 76-6, and 76-8 rights of the Oklahoma Resident by defense offered in MARK BITARA et al vs STATE OF TEXAS and on appeal refused trial unlawfully violating 588 U.S. ____ case 17-647 right of hearing and due process denied perpetually in the case of equity in false taking, made clear in obstruction by STATE OF TEXAS in its defense to deny any right to parents not a "named title granted by the court of the States" to parents, voiding their claim on any child not given over to them by the court - a power not permitted the States or UNITED STATES; so also themed Genocide in International Law and a War Crime;

For which the continued failure to afford relief or answer is a 5 U.S.C. section 556(d), 557, and 706 "Administrative Review" now denied in the present case; a felony in 18 USC 2071 rule.

The claims of "danger" and "threat" alleged against James Allen, to deny this recovery of his child and ordinary contact, are Genoicde on face and a proof of "Hegelian Dialectics" by the Democratic Party of the United States and their supporters, who wrongly rely on the "marginalization of persons to obtain benefits" a legal theory contrary "injury to any individual is an injury to all" of American Jurisprudence.

G.W.F. Hegel, in 1820, created this concept of authoritarian violence and civil death based the false personification of felony treason against the Sovereign, represented by the majority of the public in propaganda, contrary arbitrary rule of unlawful official acts in power a tyranny not protected by "Marbury v Madison" rule of the United States, and affirmed by Justice Ginsburg in 586 U.S. ____ no 17-1091 opinion so expertly written for the Unanimous Supreme Court of the United States.

Whereby, to protect our person from false claims themed 43A O.S. 43A-5-104 rule and star chamber to this effect on fraud to violate 18 USC 2071 rule of criminal law, a protection in civil matters also per 15 U.S.C. 1692d rule, and power enjoining all States to its rule (1992n), and every Court of every County there also so enjoined;

...is this activity a treason against the people and crime against humanity, from which neither God nor history can shield the Democratic Party of the United States for their war crime.

...so evident in their acts also against Donald J. Trump, in like fashion to James Allen over 2001-2020, to portray a registered public officer as an "immediate and present danger" to disable and disbar their natural person from office, to protect the racketeering and embezzlement of benefits from the Treasury of the United States; and in the war crime genocide to include human trafficking under color of law and sale of children into perpetual concealment from one parent on no conviction or legal process, and false record themed a contract not obtained without threat of false imprisonment and forfeiture of estate for EXCESSIVE FINES, a treason against the People and prohibited act per Oklahoma Constitution 1907 rule in Article I section I-1 and Article II section II-1.

The law is clear. The right to resistance, reserved (76 O.S. 76-9). The means of resistance, which entails all powers and excludes no violence or economic or legal or political assembly against such injury, shall not be falsely construed a "threat against the public or general welfare", and such act is an aggravated felony "personation of a felony", to conceal a criminal active and open war crime. For which the failure to rise to defense of the injured party is a war crime and high crime already under Supreme Law (Treaty, UNITED STATES signature 1989), and so the UNITED STATES enjoined to act or be in default of its Sovereign rights granted conditional the Oklahoma Constitution (Article II section II-1 rule).

Know then the law, and all such persons enjoined to act without neutrality, nor with respect to their benefits or friendships or other affiliation, in the grave injury of such matters - the taking and ransom of a child to disable the business of the People in interest of consideration to employees of the UNITED STATES, a fraud not afforded authority of law or official act or office a right to them or to the UNITED STATES or any State of the Federal Union.