SDP MULTIMEDIA GROUP

In the Matter of FR-18-04

SECTION I-1
Supreme law of land.
The State of Oklahoma is an inseparable part of the Federal Union, and the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land.

SECTION II-1
Political power - Purpose of government - Alteration or reformation. All political power is inherent in the people; and government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and to promote their general welfare; and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it: Provided, such change be not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.

Oklahoma Constitution - 2020 Feb 21.

If the Laws of the United States so specified in the Supreme Law of the Land are not held to be the Supreme Law by the District Court or its officers or other agents, then shall those agents and officers and Courts alienate themselves from the office of the public trust and all offices of public profit of the United States and Federal Union, and all benefits and programs and titles also such as Title IV programs in excess of $1.4 billion USD per year to the $8.3 billion USD budget of STATE OF OKLAHOMA; when they fail to comply with 45 CFR 302.0 and 303.0 rule; and all such conditions made in consideration of payment of the portion of $28.3 billion USD to the States on Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244 rule; and such time for compliance and legislative actions to comply hence passed this day and prior November 18 2018 a barratry to deny the rule; and a crime per 43A O.S. 43A-5-104 in defamation to disparage their UNITED STATES officer in fact so detained and injured by non-compliance under the authority or jurisdiction of the same office or agent, barred by 5 U.S.C. 556(d), 557, and 706 rule at law.

A felony, barred by 18 U.S.C. 242 "Deprivation of Rights" and subject 22 O.S. 22-31 and 22-32 rule, as well as 76 O.S. 76-9 relief in civil procedure per 76 O.S. 76-8 and 76-6 fraud; to include deceit and deceit of the public in 76 O.S. 76-3 and 76-4 rule; suspending the right of the party in 76 O.S. 76-1 to enjoy the return of their child as pledged by STATE OF TEXAS jointly with STATE OF OKLAHOMA under "CHOICE OF LAW" in section 604 of the UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT, a compact between the States.

Thereby did then STATE OF OKLAHOMA "emit a bill of credit" in fraud to pay the STATE OF TEXAS, and engage in a buying of debt for its own interest not permitted Constitution of the United States of America, Article I section 9 rule.

Making false write-down of a debt "fully paid" without consent or endorsement and in violation of 21 O.S. 21-748.1 rule, debt-bondage and "human trafficking by forced labor", and refuse 21 O.S. 21-748.2 rule to provide protection and civil counterclaim; thereby delaying 14 months the relief obligated at law further in deprivation of writes between the States, a conspiracy against rights so prohibited in 18 U.S.C. section 242, a felony, on kidnapping of a UNITED STATES CITIZEN in 2001-2020.

Affirm then the right of such resort to II-3 and II-22 rule of Article II of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma, and notice therein of Article II section II-1 rule; the formation of SEVEN ALPHA and its associates in defense against an alien body of labor themed a XXIII-1A violation and criminal activity documented in over 300 pages of death threats to JAMES ARNOLD ALLEN, a registered agent of the UNITED STATES then in office of record and service made to threaten destruction upon by Renee Banks in 2018 and Lakeshia McMillan in 2019, by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, an attack upon the UNITED STATES in INTERSTATE COMMERCE by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE into the juris of Pontotoc County, and suspension then of rights in pledge to the return of hostages ordered to possession of JAMES ALLEN in claims of false nature under Federal Treasury and benefits fraud themed 18 U.S.C. 666 violation; a felony; and so prohibited by operation of law 28 U.S.C. section 1738A(e) rule; a felony.

Making then death threats, threats of death by fire, destruction of real estate, murder, mutilation, and public hunting to "bloody" the body of the agent and natural person sufficient to emplore in writing that such person obtain weapons to defend their person; and then to allege also that such act be a cause of RED FLAG law, to further attack the Republican in his home and community in this action in 2013-2020 publication under user name employing the California Radio Code for 1st Degree murder, and other threat of sexual violence against women in his association including three or more persons and with image to incite the public to do harm to these persons also in intimidation of witnesses in PONTOTOC COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

Makes then criminal complaint of this extortion to deny the estate of WITHERSPOON, ALLEN, KLEPPER, and TAYLOR of their businesses, property, and personal practice by threat of hostage taking in 2001-2020 resultant in the death of two members of the Witherspoon family, one member of the Allen family, and one member of the Taylor family; a serious crime of sedition, insurrection, rebellion, and violation of Article 15, 16 and 23 of the Lieber Code (General Order No 100); to incite war against the United States and against the people; for whom the legal person UNITED STATES alone has no political power to answer and no right to waive this offense or afford it remedy which does not per Oklahoma Constitution article II section II-6 meet all obligations to the same and afford a "return to peace" not made without 18 U.S.C. 1589 protection from "serious harm" and 1593 "mandatory restitution" so also afforded the many rights of 15 U.S.C. 1692n rule; citing 15 U.S.C. 1692d and 1692g violations seeking forfeiture for a civil debt barred by 45 CFR 302.56(c), 302.56(f), and 302.56(g) and 303.6 rule prohibiting demands over sixty (60) days past due from enforcement of any kind; a false debt per 18 U.S.C. Chapter 95 and 96, and form of human trafficking per 22 U.S.C. Chapter 22 so defined in section 7102 "Abuse of legal process or procedure" to engage in human trafficking.

Such acts evident in the records obtained to show criminal fraud and medical malpractice of the UNITED STATES employees and STATE OF OKLAHOMA employees, paired also with medical malpractice of STATE OF TEXAS employees, so shown by license and abuse of license in direct contempt of "KELLY v KELLY" (2007) and "Malone v Malone" (1979), Oklahoma Supreme Court; prior "Timbs v Indiana" (586 U.S. ___ case 17-1091) ruling by 9-0 authority of the Supreme Court of the United States in contest to this abuse "repugnant to the Constitution of the United States" by those officers, employees, and licensed persons carrying out an embezzlement fraud against the benefits of the United States (18 U.S.C. 666).

And against such fraud the contemptuous reproach of similar character by the House of the 116th Congress in 2019 and 2020 expose a "clear and present danger to the United States" and a threat to the "Republican form of government" - a guarantee of the lawful authority invested by limited license in those non-sovereign parties abandonment of the office of the political power invested in their license and commission; treason on prima facia - against the people of the State of Oklahoma and United States. Whose loyalty the offices and agents of the public trust owe their commission and duty above that of the body politic in legal person, UNITED STATES.

That we recognize these entities as natural persons and legal incorporated persons in trust not inseparable at law, contrary the clear rule of Oklahoma Constitution Article II section II-1, is the offense against the parties in violation of 21 O.S. 21-8 rule; and to regard in law the natural persons as is stated in 22 O.S. 22-4, so also written:

§22-4. Construction of words. Unless when otherwise provided, words used in this code in the present tense include the future as well as the present. Words used in the masculine comprehend as well the feminine and neuter. The singular number includes the plural, and the plural the singular. And the word person includes a corporation as well as a natural person. R.L.1910, § 2090.

And having done so in rights the claim made, and agents of the Court and State refused to act, that the abandonment of their office is so noticed the failure to offer reply in thirty (30) days of formal service of process , the indictment on information sufficient (22-409), without need to re-argue the basis of 586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091 rule. Nor to re-iterate the operation of law which is a "final judgment in TEXAS FAMILY CODE section 157.261 and UIFSA "CHOICE OF LAW" so invoked the rule of the case, a finding of "automatic mistrial" per KELLY v KELLY" also present in the person of "Veronica M. Petersen" then wholly in default upon December 2001 court record, beyond consternation.

§22-409. Indictment or information, when sufficient.
The indictment or information is sufficient if it can be understood therefrom:
1. That it is entitled in a court having authority to receive it, though the name of the court be not stated.
2. That it was found by a grand jury or presented by the district attorney of the county in which the court was held.
3. That the defendant is named, or if his name cannot be discovered, that he is described by a fictitious name, with the statement that his true name is unknown.
4. That the offense was committed at some place within the jurisdiction of the court, except where the act, though done without the local jurisdiction of the county, is triable therein.
5. That the offense was committed at some time prior to the time of filing the indictment or information.
6. That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended.
7. That the act or omission charged as the offense, is stated with such a degree of certainty, as to enable the court to pronounce judgment upon a conviction according to the right of the case.
R.L.1910, § 5746.

§22-411. Matters which need not be stated.
Neither presumptions of law, nor matters of which judicial notice is taken, need be stated in an indictment or information.
R.L.1910, § 5748.

Operation of Law / Final Judgment / Automatic Mistrial

Neither Operation of Law [Cornell] nor a final judgment [Upcounsel] need be explained or effort beyond citation of the December 16 2016 date of "Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244" made notice and citation of 45 CFR 302.0 and 303.0 rule; obligating the Court "must" comply with the rule then set in 45 CFR 302.56 and 303.6 regarding false claims of false debt and to disbar their standing and demand proof specified therein of the sixty (60) day factual earning against which such claim is twenty-five (25) percent of the net income of the accused be made, or a barratry (21 O.S. 21-550) be evident and so confessed at law.

Further, 42 U.S.C. Section 666(a)(9)(a)

(9)Procedures which require that any payment or installment of support under any child support order, whether ordered through the State judicial system or through the expedited processes required by paragraph (2), is (on and after the date it is due)—

(A)a judgment by operation of law, with the full force, effect, and attributes of a judgment of the State, including the ability to be enforced,

(B)entitled as a judgment to full faith and credit in such State and in any other State, and

(C)not subject to retroactive modification by such State or by any other State;

except that such procedures may permit modification with respect to any period during which there is pending a petition for modification, but only from the date that notice of such petition has been given, either directly or through the appropriate agent, to the obligee or (where the obligee is the petitioner) to the obligor.

Texas Family Code § 157.261.
Unpaid Child Support as Judgment

(a) A child support payment not timely made constitutes a final judgment for the amount due and owing, including interest as provided in this chapter.

(b) For the purposes of this subchapter, interest begins to accrue on the date the judge signs the order for the judgment unless the order contains a statement that the order is rendered on another specific date.

Would by express UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT section "CHOICE OF LAW" make then the operation of law in the statute of STATE OF TEXAS incurring on case 01-17702-R a final judgment the sole award of $500.00 USD in any matter not themed interest on an unpaid judgment and such interest obligated the endorsement of Judge DEE MILLER which is not eligible ex post facto to a prior date, a fraud and false debt wrongly filed with the UNITED STATES in forgery of estate title and in the act to 'emit a bill of credit' by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA not a legal amount due and paid in full prior 2004, after which they continued to harass and defame the party to pay repeatedly in violationof 42 U.S.C. section 666(a)(10) contrary all change in income, in an EXCESSIVE FINE depriving the party of all right to see or speak with his child during 2001 October to 2020 January without legal cause; a felony and under Supreme Law a "War Crime" per "The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide", a United States Treaty on November 25 1988, making it "Supreme Law of the United States", and per Article I section I-1, the "Supreme Law of the Lawn" of Oklahoma also as of that date prior Petersen v Allen (2001 Oct - 2020 Present).

Remedy for which is obligated per:

Oklahoma Constitution, Article II section II-6

And such act a criminal act by Federal Law:
18 U.S.C. 242

18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

Constituting a Conspiracy Against Rights Per:
18 U.S. Code § 241.Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(a), title XXXII, §§ 320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

§22-412. Pleading a judgment.
In pleading a judgment or other determination of, or proceeding before a court or officer of special jurisdiction it is not necessary to state the facts conferring jurisdiction; but the judgment or determination may be stated to have been duly given or made. The facts constituting jurisdiction, however, must be established on the trial.
R.L.1910, § 5749.

§22-413. Pleading private statute.
In pleading a private statute, or a right derived therefrom, it is sufficient to refer to the statute by its title and the day of its passage, and the court must thereupon take judicial notice thereof.
R.L. 1910, Sec. 5750.

It is evident that the STATE OF TEXAS wrongly construed child support to be 12x18 payments of a fee ($500) in excess of actual earnings and under conditions of duress, incarceration without conviction, and human trafficking witnessed by C. Melton Maidt in deposition and three other persons, and so also imposed without factual income finding or evidence an ex parte collateral contract of criminal design, did then create a debt for the payment of a fee of such duration not afforded any legal right per EXCESSIVE FINES and suspend without legal cause the 76 O.S. 76-1 rights of JAMES ALLEN to take and to conceal his child from his home and legal address of the child also, for purpose of kidnapping, ransom, and extortion in a plan described in XXIII-1A rule. Disbarring even the due process rights of JAMES ALLEN in the record that Veronica M. Petersen was Dec 2001 "wholly in default" in case 01-17702-R, a perjury alleging abandonment to conceal a child snatching (21 O.S. 21-891, a felony).

The prior act a crime by State of Oklahoma Constitutional Rule; and thereby carry out a plan to forfeit his estate and public office to the UNITED STATES over 2009-2020, in addition to seeking TRADE SECRETS from 2001-2020 in purpose of a foreign power; a criminal export of technology themed a violation of the WASSANGAAR AGREEMENT.

So did they by this act install in the UNITED STATES officer a clear and legal cause to invoke FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 81 NUMBER 244 in 45 CFR rule against such activity a treason against the office of the UNITED STATES in State of Oklahoma; so themed 18 U.S.C. 2383 and 2384 offense refused relief on conspiracy of STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA to a criminal contempt of the "Laws of the United States" not requiring consent of any officer or waiver of rights a privilege reserved or held by UNITED STATES against the natural person James Allen so enjoined to 18 U.S.C. 1981 deprivation of equal protection (set forth also in II-1 rule, Constitution of the State of Oklahoma) and also 18 U.S.C. section 1994 protections; made clear by Timbs v Indiana(2019), Turner v Rogers et al (2011), Kelly v Kelly (2007), Malone v Malone (1979) and expressly reliant upon void protections first invoked in fraud in "MARK BITARA et al v STATE OF TEXAS" on appeal for "MARK BITARA et al v UNITED STATES", disclaimed by "588 U.S. _____ case 17-647" ruling (2019).

Pursuant Oklahoma Law, 22 O.S. 22-31 and 22-32, JAMES ALLEN and his estate and officers are entitled then to protection and cite 43A O.S. 43A-5-104 violations in written evidence the cause to support such kidnapping by UNITED STATES and STATE OF OKLAHOMA employees made a false trial by 40 minute interview; in classic fraud a violation per KELLY v KELLY (2007) already prior filed with the court; and a purposeful obstruction of justice to protect Clay B. Pettis, on behalf of CSED/CSS and "OK DHS", and "Lakeshia McMillan" on behalf of the STATE OF TEXAS; and Director "Renee Banks", who would be liable per 21 O.S. 21-1641, which reads:

§21-1641. Director presumed to have knowledge.
Any director of a corporation or joint stock association is deemed to possess such a knowledge of the affairs of his corporation, as to enable him to determine whether any act, proceeding or omission of its directors, is a violation of this article.
R.L.1910, § 2731.

The term corporation does not specify 501(c) or government organization, and per Federal Law there place upon the personal obligationt he signatory of the November 2018 letter making demands for property contrary 586 U.S. _____ case 17-1091 rule to threaten JAMES ALLEN in demand of funds over factual income and refused 42 U.S.C. section 666(a)(10) protections an invalid debt not lawful; extortion and blackmail complaint in abuse of office by Renee Banks, Director of OK DHS and her STATE OF OKLAHOMA employer, subject Federal civil suit and relief so long as FR-18-04 and 01-17702-R sustain a matter before the court, a protracted obstruction of justice to impose suspicion for a kidnapping and concealment without due process in perjury and to commit robbery of an Oklahoma Resident then passing through State of Texas with his child in his physical care and in his motor vehicle at the time of unlawful, premeditated, and planned removal on no writ or legal cause; a kidnappping concealed by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA aided by employees of the UNITED STATES resident there from 2001-2020.