SDP MULTIMEDIA GROUP

Pricing Model

Business and professional pricing includes payroll for multiple employees, advertising media buys as a cooperative pricing among many clients to obtain wholesale rates, and other strategies.

It is not intended for consumers or regional wage-level consumer budgets.

As a young man, growing up in Oklahoma, this would upset me a great deal. After all, why would a piece of software cost $5000 per user? That seemed to me, a boy in a town of 9,000 people, outrageous. Almost a fee - to keep me out of business.

The reality is, after I began doing payroll, medical insurance, and operational costs for companies like Nortel Networks and other Fortune 500 clients; I realized the overhead costs and expenses were more similar to commodities markets. Prices are high during off seasons, when no crops are available, and low during harvest. But markets operate based on fiscal year-over-year average costs to maintain consistent pricing for consumers in a time-sensitive market.

Therefore, while advertising seems low - media buys for peak cycle events and response are very very high. We lose money on media buys occassionally, for clients long term success, because those are long term clients.

Short term (first time) clients do not get to 'borrow' or obtain 'credit' based on the hope their product sells well. For the welfare of our other clients, we charge those new accounts the 'average' rates, and likewise do not expect or make royalty or 'partner' deals with businesses who do not have a proven track record and substantial manpower to carry the logistics of offers we represent.

Represenation - not performance of service - is the industry of marketing and advertising.

As such, as a specialized service, small business who expect their service to be billed and customers handled by a marketing agency will be corrected in their expectations. A good firm represents the brand, but directs the core customer to the maker of the actual product.

Intermediate 'volume inquiry services' like John Sykes business, offer alternatives for this separate business, and require high population centers due to turn-over and mobility of labor which the Midwest simply does not afford. Customers can be 'difficult', and there is a business for this need, at $40 per hour or more per agent.

For everyone else who want to answer their own phone, SDP MULTIMEDIA GROUP provide core network infrastructure and media with its partners now established 9 years consecutively.

We do not make PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES or ROI claims. In reality, in technology and cutting edge services competing with foreing soverien investmnet funds sporting 300,000 employees per organization - we advise correctly: your chances and your likely strategy.

Our field is in how to fight a firm like Microsoft, Dell, Gateway, or Chinese Government acting through front-companies, to offer your product without getting financially decapitated. That is a 10-20 year business strategy, not an overnight success. Even if the moves we make to seize market share through agility and controversy seem suddenn - our strategy is long term.

A market year may yield $2 million USD per month, but a brand in equity yields $1 billion in market capitalization and exit. If your goal is to fundraise, that assumes high risk.

When your goal is to build a brand to stand up to very large competitors, we excell in staying power and operational management for cost-efficiency. Those acts have a floor price, based on very real market and environmental threshholds, and companies operating at the sub-$5 million captial market may not be suitable for growth opportunities we focus.

In terms I grew up with, "This is not a bake sale. It is a world war."

"Commence to fightin or commence ta' running."

Pricing would betray you to sell you a product that is non-competitive at a national level for a national or International contest. In that regard, we are very honest, and our goals are not on the local or regional level only. We focus in International and national media scope.

Be aware of that, and the labor costs in those markets impact on what local wages might not deem acceptable. $75-$800 per hour are not uncommon billable costs, for specific services. Those costs are incorporated into our entry-level packages for foreign and major metro markets.

If state college programs offered 'training' or 'degrees' in those "high end generalist" skills, those services would not exist. If you are still looking at the world through a college credit catalog, that's your problem - not the solution. Even Harvard acknowledged today the new rules of market, shedding light on the Google Inc. business plan using this strategy already. Our partner offers this service for specialized business in "Heavy Operator" programs and training.

Cancel culture, like nazi progrom activity against the Jews, increases this cost by 50-200% due to fraud and terrorist activity, whcih would not be necessary if customers insure they train and recognize academic fraud in market such as degree-based claims and false moral dichotomy fraud more quickly. In the end, both of these are forms of hate crime arising from increased business with socialist China and Japan, normalized by U.S. business leaders and college programs, just like the schools who supported the "German Bund" and other nazi programs aimed at vulnerable youth by Adolph Hitler and Karl Marx. Both students of a deviant form of religion-as-science founded by Prussian philosopher "G.W.F. Hegel" in 1821.

In general, if someone asserts something as 'science' and then alleges you are mentally ill if you don't comply - or disagree - just punch that nazi. That advice, is free.

The effort to use medical terminology to bully conservatives, republicans, and business owners to surrender their equity and even give up contact with family members as a conditon of social justice, has left our firm on a war footing with foreign influence of U.S. courts and state and Federal goverment. If you are not comfortable resisting that abuse, another firm may serve you better. Our goal is to uphold the law as United States officers. Our policies are based on those laws, not the customs or fraud you may encounter in their abuse. Our founder has a clinical degree in psychology, in the Jungian Christian context, and is not willing to defame religious or moral values to sell products or services, or disclaim the value of ordinary human relationships in promotion of content to fringe markets. We are very tolerant and open-minded, but do not abide exclusion behavior toward the nuclear family, marriage, and laws of such agreements currently being abused by STATE OF TEXAS and others hostile states governments - such as forced sex assignment of 9 year old boys against the will of a parent and sole expense placed on that parent also by STATE OF TEXAS now (2020 Aug 15).

As a result, services may not be available in all states, due to boycotts related this abuse of prisonsers and children, themed Human Trafficking by incorporated states in some areas. Resistance to this form of abuse by the court 'under color of law' (22 USC 7102) are a factor in our costs, based on legal service fees associated with criminal activity by the incorporated bodies of STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, and UNITED STATES violation of 45 CFR and other laws.

More information on the nature of this serious abuse by the incorporated states and their agents is available in the oral argument of Justice Ginsberg for the unanimous Supreme Court, available here.

The ruling made then plainly refutes the 'sovereign immunity' claims to impose forced labor and excessive fines, as we see in:

Incorporated Bill of Rights guarantees are "enforced against the States under the Fourteenth Amendment according to the same standards that protect those personal rights against federal encroachment." Id., at 765 (internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, if a Bill of Rights protection is incorporated, there is no daylight between the federal and state conduct it prohibits or requires.1

Notwithstanding the States' apparent agreement that the right guaranteed by the Excessive Fines Clause was fundamental, abuses continued. Following the Civil War, Southern States enacted Black Codes to subjugate newly freed slaves and maintain the prewar racial hierarchy. Among these laws' provisions were draconian fines for violating broad proscriptions on "vagrancy" and other dubious offenses. See, e.g., Mississippi Vagrant Law, Laws of Miss. §2 (1865), in 1 W. Fleming, Documentary History of Reconstruction 283-285 (1950). When newly freed slaves were unable to pay imposed fines, States often demanded involuntary labor instead. E.g., id. §5; see Finkelman, John Bingham and the Background to the Fourteenth Amendment, 36 Akron L. Rev 671, 681-685 (2003) (describing Black Codes' use of fines and other methods to "replicate, as much as possible, a system of involuntary servitude"). Congressional debates over the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the joint resolution that became the Fourteenth Amendment, and similar measures repeatedly mentioned the use of fines to coerce involuntary labor. See, e.g., Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 443 (1866); id., at 1123-1124.

Today, acknowledgment of the right's fundamental nature remains widespread. As Indiana itself reports, all 50 States have a constitutional provision prohibiting the imposition of excessive fines either directly or by requiring proportionality. Brief in Opposition 8-9. Indeed, Indiana explains that its own Supreme Court has held that the Indiana Constitution should be interpreted to impose the same restrictions as the Eighth Amendment. Id., at 9 (citing Norris v. State, 271 Ind. 568, 576, 394 N. E. 2d 144, 150 (1979)). For good reason, the protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout AngloAmerican history: Exorbitant tolls undermine other constitutional liberties. Excessive fines can be used, for example, to retaliate against or chill the speech of political enemies, as the Stuarts' critics learned several centuries ago. See Browning-Ferris, 492 U. S., at 267. Even absent a political motive, fines may be employed "in a measure out of accord with the penal goals of retribution and deterrence," for "fines are a source of revenue," while other forms of punishment "cost a State money." Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U. S. 957, 979, n. 9 (1991) (opinion of Scalia, J.) ("it makes sense to scrutinize governmental action more closely when the State stands to benefit"). This concern is scarcely hypothetical. See Brief for American Civil Liberties Union et al. as Amici Curiae 7 ("Perhaps because they are politically easier to impose than generally applicable taxes, state and local governments nationwide increasingly depend heavily on fines and fees as a source of general revenue.").

When fines include the suspension of XXIII-1A "Right to work" and taking for perpetual concealment of a child, STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA in fraud to embezzlem from UNITED STATES and aided by their employees also, did in PETERSEN v ALLEN make false claims and false trial prohibited by "Kelly v Kelly" (2007) and "Malone v Maline" (1979) to create a false bond exposed in TEXAS FAMILY CODE 157.008 themed unlimited in nature; in forced labor; and to deny return of a newborn child on basis of commission not a duty or letter of marque granted monopoly by the state; from which arose FALSE CLAIMS ACT complaint then against the same for criminal act of false trial, conspiracy against rights, and child snatching felony activity sustained from 2001-2020 in EXCESSIVE FINES and criminal matter wrongly undertaken as a civil dispute, a child kidnapping to extort over $80,000 USD and $2 million USD in funds from SDP MULTIMEDIA GROUP. By which this boycott and legal action now persists in the concealment, abuse, and fraud themed a TERRORIST HOAX against our officers and their right to work in the UNITED STATES by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA jointly.

The conversion of a person into a utility, on ransom of their child, is both a war crime and genocide. This is the fraud of Chinese and Japanese activity in U.S. markets, education, and fraudulent values imposed now which obligate all UNITED STATES officers attention and resistance, and guide our firm today. It is the normalization of post-war Japanese revisionist history and Chinese nationalism, espoused as moral obligation to merit cultural bonds between our founder and children, by which abuse is normalized and refused standing a criminal act in fraud (5 U.S.C. section 706). Do not be decieved. We do not tolerate this fraud from clients.


| Home |

Copyright © 2020 SHADOWDANCERS LLC - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.