SDP MULTIMEDIA GROUP

No one may "Grant" you your "Sanity" - it is not a consensus. It is your right of "Suffrage" - the election of the authority of your equity based on who you are - and any effort to question that without proof subject due process is on face an attack against the equity of the estate which is the United States, a treason against the Republican form of Government, and an attack on what it means to be human - falsely themed all opposition to criminal will an irrational resistance to "real injury" and "serious harm" so defined in 18 USC 1589 and 22 USC 7102 rule.

A treason against the United States is defined. A treason against the State is defined. What is not defined is a treason against the Human Race. As is a felony wrong not obligated a conviction to warrant a defense (Title 22 section 22-31 and 22-32), prior action to resist and protect others - and in such acts subject civil remedy per 15 U.S..C. 1692d rule; immediate and with effect prior any criminal conviction. Those that the people so determine by their own judgment, reserved above and superior to the powers of indictment and conviction, in time of "public danger" defined in the 5th Amendment - is afforded the emergency power of a "determination" and a "condemnation" by the people, per Title 76 Section 76-9 rule; in any case pertaining 76-1, 76-3, 76-6, or 76-8 rule.

Whereby then, the Federal Union and States are subordinate and have NO AUTHORITY over the People to enact action and public statements against their injury, 'serious injury', or other wrongdoing which electronic communication afford an unlawful and INTERJURISDICITONAL reach to exceed the limited authority or will of the public office created for this defense; and having no "exclusive right" which may subordinate the rights of the People to protect themselves, their family, or their property.

With a firm conviction that such rights are superior to the common law, the Constitutional Law, and the subordinate "Statutory Law" and other courts and "public policy law" which is inferior then to these rules (586 U.S. ____ case no 17-1091) and any who obstruct this right subject civil damages or worse, per 588 U.S. ____ case 17-647, whereby no duty to return to a court or arbitration is obligated those injured, and perpetual restoration in full ane numerated duty of such agency per Oklahoma Constitution Article II section II-6 and Untied States Treaty "The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1987) - which OBLIGATES SUCH AGENTS TO PUNISH THOSE PERSONS IN PERPETUITY FOR ANY ACTION DEFINED THEREIN, an obligation of their duty. Set forth in UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT (UIFSA, Rev 2008), a contract binding over all members in enstoppel to the terms "satisfaction of all obligations", both explicit and overriding in Federal Law (15 USC 1692d, 1692n, 15 USC 1673, 28 USC 1738A (e), 42 USC 666) and express protections of 42 USC 1981 and 42 USC 1994 rule; disbarring wrongful taking of children and EXCESSIVE FINES; as PETERSEN v ALLEN and 01-177002-R demonstrate in record a case of wholly in default petitioner falsely afforded any award and in excess of a "final judgment".

To suggest the injured party be inferior in right due to a false claim that disbars these rules, is both treason against the "Laws of the United States" and treason against the Human Race.

There can be, per such terms, no quarter or relief. Nor immunity or statute of limitations, and such statuets set in Oklahoma State Law to NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE CHILD ENTERED INTO THE JURISDICTION IN WHICH THEY WERE ORDERED TO BE IN THE POSSESSION OF JAMES ALLEN, alleged never performed; making the 18 USC 241 and 242 rule of kidnapping and 21 O.S. 21-891 child snatching binding by competent court, as is prohibited also in 21 O.S. 21-748 rule and 22 USC Chapter 78 a felony.

Be so advised - this is perpetual 23 O.S. 23-9.1 violation in subsection D class III, for which unlimited civil damages are afforded, and dispute with this settled law itself in any act or omission a felony (18 USC 2071).

Stand now and deliver defense or withdraw, as no contest to the answer has been made since December 31 2018; nor jury seated in motion granted January 17 2019.

Where dissent is a crime, no resistance should arise, nor delay, not a violation of Article II section II-6 rule, a felony.

And fraud to conceal this also a felony in each count.

Stand in defense of this or admit it a treason and withdraw.

A crime in XXIII-1A rule, Article XXIII Oklahoma Constitution, against the RIGHT TO WORK, and also in 45 CFR 303.6 rule; disputing 45 CFR 302.56 rule; contrary 2016 December 17 notice and April 2017 deadline to comply by the State, an 18 USC 666 embezzlement of welfare benefits by the States and employees of the UNITED STATES made record in PETERSEN v ALLEN; themed a war crime and gencoide activity under color of law prohibited by 22 U.S.C. Chapter 78 section 7102.

These acts felony blackmail and extortion in 323 counts, per 43 O.S. 43A-5-104 Oklahoma Statutory Code; and 200 counts in false debt per 18 USC chapter 95 and 96 per false report of a "final judgment" made by TEXAS FAMILY CODE section 157.261 language, fixed in contract per 22 O.S. 22-407 rule.

The States waived their Sovereign when they accepted the Title IV grant and its terms (45 CFR), and further when they joined the Federal Union did so waive their sovereign immunity against the "Privileges and Immunities" clause of the Constitution of the United States and its "member states" in all UNITED STATES CITIZENS, which PETERSEN v ALLEN seeks to void. By doing so, all who are by association with such States in rebellion so condemned and stripped of their standing, patents, trademarks, and rights not held protected before the injured parties - under common law. Forfeit in all civil honors, the rule of the Hague Convention for this offense a rule already made law and settled International Law.

Further, the UNITED STATES and States of the Federal Union waived their Sovereignty to these claims in 1907 with the formal ratification of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma in Article II section II-1, which voids such claims cited in 588 U.S. ____ case 17-647 affording relief cited first in 586 U.S. ____ case 17-1091 that year (2019) as law since 1887, by the unanimous Supreme Court of the United States 9-0. And did enjoin the UNITED STATES to surrender the right to the name "United States" to the same "People" as legal party separate from the States of the Federal Union or UNITED STATES in Oklahoma Constitution Article I section I-1, on close reading.

Damn Smart, those Sequoya Convention diplomats were, who drafted the model of this language in 1906. Now made law.

By Estoppel in civil procedure, is the UNITED STATES and STATE OF OKLAHOMA, so estopped; upon this official act. And further in the Rule 9 condition of Civil Procedure prohibited form the DEFENSE of such claims or agreement to fraud violating 15 USC 1673(b) rule; so made void in 15 USC 1673(c) and also in 2007 ruling for "KELLY v KELLY" P100, OK Supreme Court, making Petersen v ALLEN "Automatic Mistrial" on record of December 2001, against which all concealment and taking was then a felony and fraud.

This operation of law set forth in 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(9) rule; and failure to modify the claim as obligated in 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(10) a further evidence of knowing fraud then presented record in 2018 to extort and blackmail contrary 45 CFR 303.6 rule disclaiming all debt over sixty (60) days past due.

A war crime on face, treason at length, and abandonment of the public office of the UNITED STATES and State of the Federal Union by each legal party; to the party named respondent in such civil suit - the sole agent not in default, on behalf of the People so affirmed this right and invoked fully.

Hell is the indictment of a nation.