History of Dispute Prompting 'Seven Alpha' Organization and Incorporation
The founder of Seven Alpha is a psychology honor society officer graduating in 1999 from East Central
University of Oklahoma, and father of an abducted child (2001-2019) refused lawful return in extortion
and all contact on grounds of 'imputed income' (income not real or earned, refused modification over
2001-2019) amid physical domestic violence and attempted murder of his person, family, and witnesses
in the taking of his child sustained without relief by law enforcement over 18 years.
Prior to the abduction, the father was a 'Senior Software Engineer' and lead programmer for the "Northern Telecom
Wireless Engineering Tools Division" and a registered business owner in the State of Oklahoma; as
well as a Specialist in the UNITED STATES ARMY during such abuse and prior business and prior a
"Telecommunications Administrator" for BankONE, FirstUSA, AT&T Internet Services, PeoplePC, T-Mobile
Business Cellular Services, and RMA technician for Trio Brands / Apollo Brands / Inspire Technology
His father served in the United States Air Force as an electronic warfare role, and uncle was
Cameron Lee Allen, CMS Oklahoma National Guard. Other members of the family have served over 40 years
in military roles in the UNITED STATES including Bosnia, Iraq, and missions both in uniform and in
support for Texas Instruments in advanced technology service and support roles.
This education combined
with violence and fraud installed a unique set of skills and mental experience opposed to fraud activity
in the taking, concealment, and isolation of children under color of medicine and false report themed
23 O.S. 23-9.1 subsection D class III spoliation evident in case 01-17702-R, and subsequent faudulent
conveyance of title to a new estate not-a-party at law in FR-18-04 claim made in 2018, to show the
matter a widespread fraud in the UNITED STATES activity exceeding $54 billion USD in false claims now
before the Treasury of the United States by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, and STATE OF MICHIGAN.
The founder of Seven Alpha grew up in a pediatric practice across from Valley View Regional Hospital,
where his mother was a children's physician and E.R. physician, and enjoyed the education and family
support of local physics professor Carl Rutledge.
Oklahoma Clinical Psychologists, upon hearing this,
wrote into UNITED STATES Federal record "patient claims he was raised by doctors in a hospital" in an
attempt to defraud the UNITED STATES of Title IV funds and estate of the Oklahoma parent, grossly
misrepresenting a very privileged education and upbringing with delusions to forfeit the estate of the
Oklahoma Parent to the abducting party in use of further exploitation without release of cause or
consent. Simlar claims disparaging the history of the parent which are knowingly false including
alleged conviction of substance abuse (false), dismissal of prior income of $60 USD per hour as a
delusion (false, payroll stubs and IRS records confirm); and portrayal of the parent as mentally disabled
to justify forfeiture of his business and right to work by the ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY employee and convicted
substance abuser who removed the child from his motor vehicle during INTERSTATE TRANSPORT against his demand
and to carry out threatened 'perpetual concealment' conditional demands for money and property, made in the
amount of over $200,000 USD - remain central to the dispute now before the court in PETERSEN v ALLEN, a suit
to obtain such 'unlimited taking' without relief or communication with the child concealed in conflict with
an alleged 'order of possession to JAMES ALLEN' since 2002 May 29.
Such offenses require such response as
Seven Alpha, and an institutional organization aginst fraud by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA to
subvert the 28 USC 1738A (e) law against this activity refused relief by their officers from 2001-2019.
ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGIES, SPARK HOSTING INTERNET SERVICES, NTT AMERICA, GEBHARDT BROADCASTING LLC, and
other firms with nexust to the abductor at Infomart, a facility of EQUINIX and partner with ZEN LAYER INC.
of STATE OF CALIFORNIA serviced by COGENT COMMUNICATIONS (a subsidiary of NTT AMERICA, a 25% wholly owned
corporation of the NATION OF JAPAN operating in STATE OF MICHIGAN) with facilities provided by and created
through transfer of estate from NTT GROUP to DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, expose the relationship of these firms
and their employees joint work via 'lostserver' domain registration and with PCH.NET (an NGO in STATE OF
CALIFORNIA acting now as a formal PARTNER OF NTT AMERICA) to obtain not-for-profit grants and other public
monies in combination with abuse of network services in PONTOTOC COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA using CIDR IP
ranges reserved by customers of the EQUINIX data facility at Stemmons Freeway in DALLAS TEXAS.
With over 8 million ICMP requests in 7 days transmitted to the Oklahoma site from Texas, and sustained high-SEQUENCE
ICMP fragments sent from September 1 to November 26 2019 during trial, this activity is express and clear
abuse of INTERSTATE COMMERCE and telecommunication service abuse by a foreign influenced racketeering
interstate corrupt organization named in formal criminal complaint under 18 USC Chapter 95 and 96 by
JAMES ALLEN, on behalf of RACCOON TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, a United States Corporation resident in
State of Oklahoma, citing attacks sustained with communication of a clearly express and extortion oriented
nature toward persons operating for INTERSTATE COMMERCE in contract with STATE OF CALIFORNIA and the REPUBLIC
OF GERMANY which are named in the complaint and letters submitted demonstrating the extortion demands for the
child of JAMES ALLEN and fraud in Title IV claims contrary 45 CFR 303.6, and TEXAS FAMILY CODE 157.375 rule.
As such, this activity affords all parties named and threatened at-law to 76 O.S. 76-9 rule, including the
orderly formation of security and tools, technology, and networks to counter the acts in fraud of legal persons
engaged by UNITED STATES MAIL in this wrongful taking and false claims, so prior enumerated.
Benefits of the understanding of parties at-law are possible in part to the education of grandparents of the injured party,
who were known as developers of the City of Ada, Orvil and Dorthy Price, operators of Witherspoon Finance;
whose experience in estate law to identify the legal persons and substitution of parties in case 01-17702-R
versus claim FR-18-04 as filed demonstrate a transfer of benefits ruled 'exclusively' that of a natural
born person to an estate of the UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION unlawfully, contrary recent ruling
in "Georgulas vs Younger, DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF TEXAS", and 22 O.S. 22-407 ("Words, meaning in
contract") so prohibiting this illegal entailment of what the contract themes "unlimited taking in ten (10) days
of receipt of demand, voiding all right to contest or refuse payment and subjecting the party to contept if they
do not pay regardless of means or income" a contract of 'debt-bondage' authored by DEE MILLER, and fraud per
21 O.S. 21-748.1 Oklahoma Law, so also specified in taking beyond 15 USC 1589(c) limits therein a void instrument
used in the taking for concealment in extortion of a registered commissioned UNITED STATES officer in the State
of Oklahoma, for which this remedy - known by all persons as "Seven Alpha" is installed and lawful organization
contrary 18 U.S.C. 2383 "rebellion, insurrection" and 18 USC 2384 "sedition" contrary "The Laws of the United
States" made a record of the court in January 2019 on case FR-18-04, invoking and then disclaiming also in failure
to act the compact disclosed between STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA wrongly themed a "treaty" to support its
right to supercede UNITED STATES SUPREME LAW, in the "UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT", and such act a violation
of United States Constitution Article I section 9 and 10 on face, the selling of title reserved by the people, to
create a security instrument contrary 'The Securities Act of 1934' themed unlimited taking in order 01-17702-R.
The matter, and argument before the court in the blood of the accused, themed a corruption of blood on face
examination of evidence and execution - is the centerpiece of American Jurisprudence today and Seven Alpha.
The act, cited "serious injury" per 18 USC 1589, not an illness or defect in the accused - but a treason
against the "United States" and such right to exclusive use and reservation made in 1907 by the ratification
of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma by the UNITED STATES, an official act, in Article I section I-1,
there reserving to the People the use of the term "United States" exclusive of any sovereignty and disclaiming
then all sovereignty of the States, UNION, and UNITED STATES in formal act of Congress - voiding also any claim
of STATE OF TEXAS in their own 'Constitution of the State of Texas' and long-standing fraud to misrepresent the
legal and binding meaning of its Article I section 1 clause surrendering all sovereignty to the United States,
reserving none for itself at-law by use of language 'should' rather than binding language at force in contract
a clause or condition, and so disclaimed per the 1907 agreement as final with State of Oklahoma, a contract
enumerated and on behalf of 'The People', so represented now in body at law by "Seven Alpha", separate and
distinct from UNITED STATES, a legal person and government body at law, and also by the 586 U.S. case 17-1091
ruling that UNITED STATES CITIZENS themed estates of the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION were then entitled to
all rights of natural born persons implied also by the designation of "The People" in "The Constitution of the
United States of America", a ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States and binding under UNITED STATES JURISDICTION
in and over all States explicitly and exclusively.
Whereby, states as legal persons themed government organizations -
and (the) UNITED STATES as a government organization in legal personhood also,
are not UNITED STATES CITIZENS at-law;
...these protections, privileges, and reservations made for UNITED STATES CITIZENS exclusively
shall not apply to government organizations or their agents or agency - nor be implied to them a right or privilege at-law nor
afforded their equity in standing a claim against the Seven Alpha, a designated agency of The People hereforeto assembled
to address the grievances in civil rights violations, nor sovereignty a defense permitted or discretion afforded where
not explicit at-law in statutory code.
(586 U.S. case 17-1091 and 588 U.S. case 17-647; 4th Circuit case 18-1931 through 18-1948)
The grievances of JAMES ALLEN and 200,000 other parents each year wrongly denied return of their children each year (source:
American Bar Association; 125,000 more in UK) in human trafficking under color of law so prohibited by Title 22 Chapter 78 Federal Law, nor the
refusal to initiate a lawful investigation with benefit of "cross examination of evidence" denied in PETERSEN v ALLEN,
obligated per "KELLY v KELLY" (P100, 2007 Oklahoma Supreme Court) making all acts refusing this right "automatic mistrial"
and per 586 U.S. Case 17-1091 voiding all fines as "EXCESSIVE FINES" - which are not based on "factual income" defined as
income of the party 'at-law' named (JAMES ALLEN, an estate) to exclude personal property, property of the agent, or body
of the agent or name or other reputation to include record whatsoever. When over 80% of children found in sex-trafficking
are missing from Title IV programs, these abuses and refusal to locate or permit communication without case are high crimes.
It is threfore the finding that the estate at law of the UNITED STATES, as a legal fiction, has no legal life
which is cojoined with the natural born person who is the agent installed thereof in office of the Social Security Administration
registry or other trust of legal fiction, and the denial of this
prior 586 U.S. case 17-1091 ruling a fraud against the People in embezzlement of the Treasury of the United States through
Title IV and other programs, evident on the case of "PETERSEN v ALLEN", a barratry (false prosecution, a crime) so filed
in formal complaint to conceal the felony of human trafficking in debt-bondage alleged per 21 O.S. 21-748.1 and 21-748.2
now filed in formal order as FR-18-04 in counter-suit alleging fraud in taking for perpetual concealment of a child.
Right to remedy is defined in 76 O.S. 76-1 (inherent rights), 76-3 (right against deceit of the public, scope in 76-4),
76-8 (right to return of hostages and children), and all necessary force (76-9) in Title 76 Oklahoma Statutes; so also
defined as 22-31 thorugh 22-34 in Title 22 criminal procedures of the State of Oklahoma, and such "serious injury" even
by "reckless disregard" in 21 O.S. 21-748.1 and 21-748.2 rule of the Oklahoma Criminal Code found also in Federal Law,
Title 18 section 1589 (human trafficking and peonage) and 1593 (Mandatory restitution), cited also by Ginsberg in
586 U.S. case 17-1091 explicitly.
Contrary popular belief and such reliance a fraud on face, PETERSEN v ALLEN failed to register in Oklahoma the order
01-17702-R and did not provide it nor acknowledge its validity in 2001-2019 concealment of a child, while seeking
in letters as of 2019 the forfeiture of estate, all real and personal property, and bodily forfeiture of the agent
of the estate in false claim for false party not a member of the original suit and exclusive of such rights and award
then made $500.00 USD and paid in full in 2003, affording no relief or return of hostages and on false trial a false
order per "KELLY v KELLY" (P100, 2007 OK Sup Court), having no legal substance and of record the party "Veronica M.
Petersen" then wholly in default Dec 16 2001 without award or mistrial obligated per Federal Law (Title 18 section 1981),
a fraud alleged felony 18 USC 666 "embezzlement of benefits provided by the United States", so sustained from 2001 to 2019
in FR-18-04 false filing by STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA in joint action with UNITED STATES, a ransom for civil
honors without trial or convnetion, violating 21 O.S. 21-8 (conviction must preceed punishment), in suspension of license
and refusal to admit fault on false allegation of 21 O.S. 21-566.1 wrongly themed a civil matter at-law. In short,
there never was a lawful contract, nor lawful order, and such claims are a fraud themed Federal felony embezzlement
paired with premeditated kidnapping and concealment of a child suspending habeas corpus right obligated to James Allen.
As of November 30 2019, no lawful order has been registered, and contest filed to such registration at law Dec 30 2018,
with trial set January 17 2019, and no waiver of right to speedy trial or service of trial since onset Nov 21 2018 of
formal actin in PONTOTOC COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA under Rev 2008 UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT,
there a violation of TEXAS FAMILY CODE section 157.375 (immunity from civil process during a writ of habeas corpus
action in the jurisdiction duly served upon the Title IV officer, who is agent in this matter and responsible party
per Federal Register Volume 81 No 244 issued Dec 16 2016 - and sole authority per Title IV grant to STATE OF OKLAHOMA
the party responsible to prove in formal filing 'factual income' or abandon such claim in 60 days per 45 CFR 303.6
Federal Law governing all state Title IV actions, for which STATE OF OKLAHOMA is not compliant and thus not acting
under the authority of the UNITED STATES nor public law in this matter, a kidnapping of a minor child taken from
the legal registered home address solely the possession of JAMES ALLEN at such time in premeditated plan to extort
and blackmail a registered company across State Lines from State of Texas to State of Oklahoma in August 2001-2019.
Such act a violation of 'The Hobbs Act' on prima facia evidence, and related Title 18 Chapter 95 and 96 rule violations
refused standing by UNITED STATES in fraudulent filing, themed 23 O.S. 23-9.1 subchapter D class III 'spoliation'.
Meaning, as of Nov 30 2019, there is no court order upon which to rely in the filing of a criminal charge, and indictment
for such violation made January 17 2019 was wrongful and a criminal penalty threatened under civil order in context to
written letters of extortion sealed by STATE OF OKLAHOMA and STATE OF TEXAS on balance $0.00 USD past due made by
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE to the INTERSTATE COMMERCE address of the estate named in suit a form of extortion subject
Federal Jurisdiction and 15 USC 1692d (in juris per 15 USC 1692n, also STATE OF OKLAHOMA obligated relief).
In essence, "Petersen v ALLEN" is a kidnapping violating 28 USC 1738A(e) rule and 15 USC 1589(c) rule, which has no legal standing or contract
made binding at law in STATE OF OKLAHOMA against which to rely, a fraud, prompting this organized Article I-1 and II-1
execution of rights by James Allen, in defense of injury sustained through fraud and false report of a legal order
constructed by DEE MILLER and Veronica M. Petersen, jointly with Donald Beal and Iva Petersen, named in letters of
confession to the premeditated taking of a newborn themed 21 O.S. 21-891 (child snatching) and parties at-law cited by
the abductors in demands for money, property, and false claim of abandonment to conceal a child perpetually. For which
Article II-6 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma (and 586 U.S. case 17-1091 and 588 U.S. case 17-647) expressly
disclain all statutory limitations, citing a 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 12th, and 13th Amendment violation in Federal complaint
of 18 USC 241 and 242 violation, with aggravated repeated injury prohibited per 564 U.S. 431 (Turner v Rodgers et al)
and Federal Register Volume 81 Number 244 (74 pages) expressly barred in Title IV regulatory rule since 2017 and
confessing obligation since 1991 to such relief at law. Opposition to which by a "terrorist hoax" has defined
and developed the terminology of "Hegelian Dialectics" and "Hegelian Terrorism" in "American Dialectic Jurisprudence".